286 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
286 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
## You said
|
||
List all SN shipped , and the one kept
|
||
|
||
## Gemini said
|
||
Based on the communications regarding
|
||
PO-0272806
|
||
(100x C9120AXE-B-REF to CMS Communications, Inc.), here are the serial numbers that were successfully shipped, as well as the unit that appears to have been kept
|
||
.
|
||
SNs Shipped (Total: 69 Units)
|
||
A total of 69 units were shipped across three separate batches
|
||
:
|
||
Batch 1 (Shipped May 29, 2026 - 20 Units):
|
||
The following 20 serial numbers were shipped: FJC270918FN, FJC27041K7D, FJC270918HB, FJC2428184B, FJC242612Y8, FJC25331KK9, FJC242612YA, FJC242612Y9, FJC27111BBT, FJC234916D2, FJC242916WL, FJC24401SKH, FJC250618K5, FJC24381E9Q, FJC28081EXK, FJC250618KB, FJC24401SL0, FJC25331M5V, FJC242916VZ, and FJC24381DWC
|
||
.
|
||
Batch 2 (Shipped June 1, 2026 - 28 Units):
|
||
The following 28 serial numbers were shipped: FJC27081CA2, FJC24381DM7, FJC24381E8W, FJC24311C2L, FJC24381DV4, FJC24401SHB, FJC250618AX, FJC24331ATB, FJC242916V0, FJC24381DV2, FJC250618KG, FJC2428180H, FJC24381DV9, FJC27102DKZ, FJC24511LK7, FJC24381DUJ, FJC27081CAY, FJC27081CA0, FJC27081CAX, FJC27081CA1, FJC25331KQW, FJC24401SKB, FJC242916W2, FJC242612Y5, FJC242817ZG, FJC270918G9, FJC27043K60, and FJC271823UE
|
||
.
|
||
Batch 3 (Shipped June 5, 2026 - 21 Units):
|
||
The following 21 serial numbers were shipped: FJC27102CXY, FJC27102CSS, FJC27041KKE, FJC27081CAW, FJC27041K9U, FJC27041K89, FJC25081ALQ, FJC27081CA3, FJC25101JGZ, FJC25061LWW, FJC24381DUC, FJC26291GP3, FJC242916V4, FJC24381DWD, FJC250618B7, FJC25101JJW, FJC24381E5G, FJC25101JJV, FJC27102CXZ, FJC24441S1F, and FJC27141WFH
|
||
.
|
||
The SN Kept
|
||
FJC28081EXK
|
||
This serial number was initially documented as shipped in the first batch on May 29, 2026
|
||
. It was subsequently excluded from later shipments (such as PO-0272591 on June 2) with the explicit note that it had "already shipped to CMS last wk"
|
||
. However, on June 8, an internal message noted to "connect to TS if you find this" regarding FJC28081EXK, indicating that despite being marked as shipped, it was likely kept or accidentally left behind in the facility
|
||
.
|
||
(Note: SN
|
||
FJC27041KKE
|
||
was also temporarily kept aside on June 2 for recovery, but it was ultimately shipped out in the third batch on June 5
|
||
.)
|
||
|
||
## You said
|
||
List all items with issue (SN + PID if possible)
|
||
|
||
## Gemini said
|
||
Here are the items reported with issues, categorized by the type of problem:
|
||
Boot, System, and Connectivity Failures
|
||
PID:
|
||
C9300-24P-A |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FCW2303DHNT - This unit experienced a boot failure and displayed a "BOOT FAIL" error.
|
||
PID:
|
||
SUP32 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
SAL1338Z2TC - This unit generated a traceback error (Error75).
|
||
PID:
|
||
pfc2 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
SAL1339ZJD8 - This component generated a traceback error alongside the SUP32.
|
||
PID:
|
||
msfc2 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
SAL1339ZGPX - This component generated a traceback error alongside the SUP32.
|
||
PID:
|
||
N5K-C5596UP |
|
||
SN:
|
||
Not specified - The PSU, fans, and LEDs powered on successfully, but the unit failed to provide any console output.
|
||
Faulty or Failed Testing
|
||
PID:
|
||
NIM-2GE-CU-SFP |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FOC23503PHV - This module was explicitly marked as bad and faulty.
|
||
PID:
|
||
NIM-2GE-CU-SFP |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FOC24331W30 - This module was explicitly marked as bad and faulty.
|
||
PID:
|
||
NIM-2GE-CU |
|
||
SN:
|
||
Not specified (2 units) - These modules were tested in an ISR4331 and were suspected to be bad.
|
||
PID:
|
||
MV86-HW / MR86-HW |
|
||
SNs:
|
||
Q3AE-EGKE-B3X2, Q3AE-SZD8-3PPD, Q3AE-6S3U-Y6N5, Q3AE-VWFF-6MGG, Q3AE-8P53-P74T, Q3AE-SFXM-7CK2 - These units failed testing because they booted but the LED remained orange when an Ethernet cable was connected.
|
||
PID:
|
||
MR86-HW |
|
||
SN:
|
||
Q3AE-DMMG-D9KV - There was an explicit instruction not to ship this specific unit, indicating a probable fault.
|
||
Physical Damage (Broken Parts, Bent Chassis, Scratches)
|
||
PID:
|
||
C8300-1N1S-6T |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FLM290910DT - This chassis had a broken RFID module that could not be fixed.
|
||
PID:
|
||
C8300-1N1S-6T |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FLM280510M6 - This unit had a broken RFID module that could not be fixed, and the aesthetics were deemed unfixable.
|
||
PID:
|
||
DS-C9148T-K9 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
JPG2603008A - This switch suffered from a bent chassis and bent ports that could not be repaired.
|
||
PID:
|
||
DS-CAC-650W-E |
|
||
SNs:
|
||
ART2311FQQ3, ART2504F89E, ART2311FQQ2, ART2504F8H7 - These units were noted as having broken handles that required physical replacement.
|
||
PID:
|
||
WS-SUP32-GE-3B (Component) |
|
||
SN:
|
||
SAL09402986 - This component was returned with a damaged power connector.
|
||
PID:
|
||
IE-4010-16S12P |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FDO244114ZK - This unit was missing a black plastic mode button, which required a full module replacement to fix.
|
||
PID:
|
||
C9120AXE |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FJC27141WMG - This chassis was set aside due to physical condition and described as "most ugly".
|
||
PID:
|
||
C3850-NM-4-10G |
|
||
SNs:
|
||
FOC23262KMY, FJZ233020CU - These modules were described as "most ugly" due to physical condition.
|
||
PID:
|
||
WS-C3750X-48P-S |
|
||
SNs:
|
||
Not specified - Most units in a large batch were reported as bad with many scratches on the top of the chassis.
|
||
Missing Internal Components
|
||
PID:
|
||
CISCO2821 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FTX1134A22A - This unit was missing its FAN, PSU, and FACEPLATE.
|
||
PID:
|
||
CISCO2821 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FTX0950C0GD - This unit was missing its PSU and FACEPLATE.
|
||
PID:
|
||
CISCO2821 |
|
||
SN:
|
||
FTX1418AKP2 - This unit was missing its PSU and FAN.
|
||
PID:
|
||
ISR4331 |
|
||
SNs:
|
||
Not specified (2 units) - These units were missing the internal power cables that connect the PSU to the motherboard.
|
||
|
||
## You said
|
||
List all SN transferred to AUS/Australia
|
||
|
||
## Gemini said
|
||
Based on the records in
|
||
aJoe.md
|
||
, here are the serial numbers explicitly noted as being kept aside to ship or transferred to Australia (AUS):
|
||
C9200-STACK Modules (June 1–2 Records)
|
||
These units were instructed to be kept aside to ship to Australia
|
||
:
|
||
JAE234004PC
|
||
JAE234004T3
|
||
JAE25360Z1S
|
||
JAE25360ZXV
|
||
JAE25360ZXW
|
||
JAE25360WQ5
|
||
JAE25210K5G
|
||
JAE25360U84
|
||
JAE25360U7W
|
||
JAE26440B4B
|
||
JAE26402RM2
|
||
FDO24260JB2
|
||
JAE2610039Z
|
||
JAE25210GZQ
|
||
FDO19321P8C
|
||
JAE25360VU0
|
||
FDO20120G3J
|
||
JAE23051476
|
||
JAE230601NH
|
||
FVH27510R69
|
||
JAE25161CTG
|
||
FDO24250TUS
|
||
FDO24250T0B
|
||
FDO24260G32
|
||
STACK-T4-50CM Modules (June 1–2 Records)
|
||
These stacking cables were also set aside for the Australia shipment
|
||
:
|
||
LCC2428GA36
|
||
LCC2618GGEJ
|
||
MOP2732A3H9
|
||
LCC2246GX01
|
||
LCC2625GFEE
|
||
MOC261800C4
|
||
MOC261801GT
|
||
MOC261700NW
|
||
MOP2732A3EX
|
||
LCC2320GCQW
|
||
Additional C9200-STACK Modules (June 19 Records)
|
||
These serial numbers were documented under the "Import Australia Fedex / TNT" shipment log to increase the overall stack module transfer total
|
||
:
|
||
FVH29100T7W
|
||
FVH29100X6E
|
||
FVH2910151B
|
||
FVH29100XBB
|
||
FVH29100VEM
|
||
FVH29100TH7
|
||
FVH29100VQ1
|
||
FVH29100U1P
|
||
FVH29100TNL
|
||
JAE23180HMY
|
||
JAE25360VTV
|
||
FDO23290KA5
|
||
FDO24260J5C
|
||
JAE241108B5
|
||
FDO23290LAT
|
||
JAE26360XUR
|
||
JAE26382LDW
|
||
JAE25360VD8
|
||
FDO22263HYZ
|
||
FDO22040VZ4
|
||
(Note: It is also mentioned that a batch of
|
||
SSD-SATA-960G
|
||
units was successfully sent out on a shipment to Australia, though their specific serial numbers were not recorded in the text
|
||
.)
|
||
|
||
## You said
|
||
List all SN in this format that has been shipped:
|
||
xxxx-xxxx-xxxx
|
||
|
||
## Gemini said
|
||
Based on the provided document, here are all the serial numbers matching the
|
||
xxxx-xxxx-xxxx
|
||
format that have been explicitly shipped
|
||
:
|
||
MR36-HW
|
||
Q3AJ-49HS-7EJT
|
||
CW9162I-MR
|
||
Q5AA-JNPC-SYDC
|
||
MV32-HW
|
||
Q2PV-2885-9WH5
|
||
Q2PV-599H-DNSD
|
||
Q2PV-C6EG-KB2J
|
||
Q2PV-A6NU-EQX8
|
||
Q2PV-DL34-7UEG
|
||
Q2PV-WP5A-5HGM
|
||
Q2PV-KQL5-GFS3
|
||
Q2PV-VPCA-HBCB
|
||
Q2PV-LQ7U-3RFS
|
||
Q2PV-GQMH-F5LJ
|
||
Q2PV-5ZQ9-5DD8
|
||
Q2PV-VW84-729Z
|
||
Q2PV-GFSK-KDPC
|
||
Q2PV-3X3G-2QU2
|
||
Q2PV-EJ4U-9EG4
|
||
MR86-HW
|
||
Q3AE-AY5R-YV22
|
||
Q3AE-2MKJ-V78D
|
||
Q3AE-3PRL-VL68
|
||
Q3AE-52NF-QY6E
|
||
Q3AE-RNQP-HXGT
|
||
Q3AE-9FKB-VBJ7
|
||
Q3AE-DDPF-UH9A
|
||
MR46-HW
|
||
Q3AC-EM2G-7YQB
|
||
Q3AC-HR8D-SKQQ
|
||
Q3AC-ZGGB-7KH8
|
||
Q3AC-FHVK-PUFD
|
||
Q3AC-EC8J-J5L4
|
||
Q3AC-MUBP-Z6H6
|
||
|
||
## You said
|
||
Can a 7B model running on RTX 4000 8Gb GPU answer the questions above ?
|
||
|
||
## Gemini said
|
||
Yes, it is technically possible, but it would likely struggle to provide a perfectly accurate and complete answer. Running a 7B model on an 8GB GPU to perform complex data extraction requires significant compromises.
|
||
Here is a breakdown of the technical and cognitive hurdles a 7B model would face with this specific task:
|
||
1. Hardware Constraints (VRAM Limitations)
|
||
An 8GB GPU cannot load a standard 16-bit 7B model, which requires roughly 14GB of VRAM just for the weights. To run it on an RTX 4000 (8GB), you would have to
|
||
quantize
|
||
the model (e.g., using 4-bit quantization formats like GGUF, AWQ, or EXL2).
|
||
The Weight:
|
||
A 4-bit 7B model takes up about 4 to 4.5 GB of VRAM.
|
||
The KV Cache (Context Window):
|
||
The document you provided is quite long and contains thousands of tokens. The remaining 3.5 GB of VRAM limits how much text you can feed the model at once. If the document exceeds the context limit that fits in your remaining VRAM, the model will throw an Out of Memory (OOM) error.
|
||
2. Cognitive Limitations (Accuracy and Recall)
|
||
Even if you fit the document into the model's context window, smaller 7B and 8B models (like Llama 3 8B or Mistral 7B) have known limitations with this specific type of heavy data-extraction task:
|
||
The "Needle in a Haystack" Problem:
|
||
7B models struggle to maintain attention across long texts. When asked to find scattered details (like "items with issues" mixed into dozens of emails), they frequently miss items or hallucinate incorrect associations.
|
||
List Truncation:
|
||
When asked to list 69 random, non-sequential alphanumeric strings (like the shipped serial numbers), 7B models almost always get "lazy." They will output the first 10 to 15 items and then stop, hallucinate patterns, or summarize the rest instead of completing the exact task.
|
||
Pattern Matching:
|
||
While a 7B model understands the request to find the
|
||
xxxx-xxxx-xxxx
|
||
format, an LLM is essentially guessing the next token based on probability. It is far less reliable at scanning for strict formatting rules over a massive text block than a simple Python Regular Expression (Regex) script.
|
||
The Verdict
|
||
You can run a quantized 7B model on your hardware, and it will give you a
|
||
plausible-sounding
|
||
answer. However, for a task requiring 100% accuracy in extracting dozens of random serial numbers from a long, noisy email thread, a 7B model will likely drop data, hallucinate serial numbers, or truncate the lists.
|
||
Are you currently trying to set up a local AI environment for processing these types of inventory files?
|
||
This conversation was created with Gemini Advanced. Gemini Advanced isn't available for you, but you can start a new chat about this topic.
|
||
Learn more
|
||
Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.
|